Skip to main content

Navigating the New Securities and Exchange Commission Disclosure Landscape and What it Means for Companies

What are Securities and Exchange Commission disclosure requirements?

In an era increasingly focused on sustainability, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has made a pivotal move by requiring U.S. public companies to communicate how they are managing material risks related to climate change and how those risks affect their bottom line.

Reporting requirements under the new rules include:

Companies under the new rules are also required to report on expenses and losses resulting from severe weather events and other natural conditions, such as hurricanes, wildfires, floods and drought, and on the costs related to carbon offsets and renewable energy credits if they are used as a material component in the company’s plans to achieve climate-related goals.

What is the SEC rule on carbon reporting?

These new reporting requirements allow investors more transparency with regard to the potential impacts of climate change on U.S. public companies, and how they contribute to a warming planet via GHG emissions.

Why did the SEC exclude Scope 3 Emissions from its requirements?

The SEC decision to exclude Scope 3 emissions from its climate disclosure requirements represents a significant departure from the comprehensive tracking and reporting of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions initially proposed. This move has drawn various responses from the environmental and investment communities, that have highlighted  a missed opportunity for complete transparency in the disclosure of corporate environmental impacts. Scope 3 emissions, which account for the majority of a company’s carbon footprint through indirect activities such as purchased goods, services, and downstream use of products, offer vital insights into the full spectrum of climate risk and opportunity within corporate operations.

By not mandating the disclosure of these emissions, the SEC’s rules may leave investors without a complete picture of the environmental risks companies face, potentially undermining efforts to mitigate climate-related financial risks effectively. Critics, including environmental advocacy group As You Sow, have expressed disappointment, emphasizing that the final Rule’s exclusion of Scope 3 emissions reporting weakens the ability of investors to gauge the true environmental footprint of their investments and the associated risks.

Climate change desert to green

What are the Implications of the SEC reporting requirements for Public Companies?

The SEC’s climate rule ushers in comprehensive changes, affecting not just financial reporting but also reshaping risk management and corporate governance structures. Public companies must now integrate environmental considerations into their strategic planning and reporting mechanisms. This means Public companies will need to be more transparent about their environmental impact and how climate change could potentially affect their operations and financial performance. Companies must also bolster their reporting systems, ensuring they can accurately track and disclose climate-related data. However, these  changes represent more than just a revised compliance requirement; they also represent an opportunity to showcase sustainability efforts to investors and stakeholders.

Best practices for publicly traded companies: What strategies should be adopted?

  1. Data Governance: Firms must ensure that their data management systems are capable of handling the additional reporting demands.
  2. Stakeholder Engagement: Proactive communication with relevant stakeholders is paramount in navigating the implications of these changes.
  3. Adaption: Public companies should not only comply but also strive to use these new requirements to their competitive advantage by embedding sustainability in their core business models.
Man looking at stocks on many computers

A Way Forward

For companies aiming to position themselves as leaders in sustainability, transparency, and resilience, voluntarily going beyond the minimum reporting requirements will prove advantageous.

By leveraging Shift Critical’s industry-leading data analysis and reporting solutions, businesses can go beyond minimum reporting requirements and proactively address their full spectrum of emissions and environmental impacts.

With Shift Critical, you can foster investor trust, build consumer loyalty, and anticipate and mitigate potential regulatory expansions in the future. This moment should be seen not just as a compliance hurdle, but as a compelling opportunity to drive sustainability innovation within your organization. Embrace the evolving landscape of corporate responsibility with Shift Critical – because in a world increasingly attuned to sustainability, adaptation is not just necessary, it’s critical.

By proactively addressing and disclosing the full spectrum of emissions and environmental impacts, businesses can not only foster greater investor trust and consumer loyalty, but also anticipate and mitigate potential regulatory expansions in the future.

Let's Discuss Your Sustainability Strategy Today